﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Employer's Law Blog - The Online Human Resource</title><link>http://www.employerslawblog.com/</link><description>The latest headlines and articles from The Employer's Law Blog</description><copyright>(c) 2008, Day Pitney LLP. All rights reserved.</copyright><ttl>5</ttl><item><title>The New EEOC Workplace Poster</title><link>http://www.employerslawblog.com/Entry.aspx?eID=262</link><description>&amp;nbsp;The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) revised its workplace poster to incorporate the changes to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, wh... &lt;a href='http://employerslawblog.com/Entry.aspx?eID=262'&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;</description><datePosted>11/5/2009</datePosted></item><item><title>Supreme Court Decides Important Reverse Discrimination Case</title><link>http://www.employerslawblog.com/Entry.aspx?eID=260</link><description>&amp;nbsp;What can an employer do when contemplating an employment decision based on objective criteria such as test scores, when the results appear to favor an employee of one race and thereby disadvanta... &lt;a href='http://employerslawblog.com/Entry.aspx?eID=260'&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;</description><datePosted>7/9/2009</datePosted></item><item><title>Supreme Court Issues New Ruling Favorable to Employers</title><link>http://www.employerslawblog.com/Entry.aspx?eID=259</link><description>&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;On June 18, 2009, in &lt;i&gt;Gross&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt; v.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMIL... &lt;a href='http://employerslawblog.com/Entry.aspx?eID=259'&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;</description><datePosted>6/22/2009</datePosted></item><item><title>Age is Different – Higher Burden of Proof for Workers</title><link>http://www.employerslawblog.com/Entry.aspx?eID=257</link><description>On June 18, 2009, the United States Supreme Court rejected the notion that an employee alleging age discrimination may use the so-called “mixed motive” theory to shift the burden of proof to the emplo... &lt;a href='http://employerslawblog.com/Entry.aspx?eID=257'&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;</description><datePosted>6/19/2009</datePosted></item><item><title>Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Terminated Employees Must Be Paid For Unused Vacation</title><link>http://www.employerslawblog.com/Entry.aspx?eID=258</link><description>&amp;nbsp;On June 11, 2009, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued its long-awaited decision in &lt;i&gt;Electronic Data Systems Corporation v. Attorney General&lt;/i&gt;, holding an employer violates ... &lt;a href='http://employerslawblog.com/Entry.aspx?eID=258'&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;</description><datePosted>6/15/2009</datePosted></item></channel></rss>